Wednesday, April 12, 2006

On the Baha'i Adminstrative Order: Unlike Any Systems of Human Government

Isn't it amazing how the Iran has emerged front and center once again on the world stage of media attention. Isn't it amazing that, although the persecution of the Baha's in Iran is increasing, so is the media attention on the Baha'i Faith. As the world turmoil increases to a fever pitch, so does the work of the Baha'is in promoting the growth and development of their clusters and in seizing the opportunities for expansion of the Faith.

Neither have the opponents of the Faith in Iran been successful "in achieving their malevalent purpose" of eradicating the Faith there, "Nor have the enemies who, at the hour of the inception of this Administrative Order,...both in the East and in the West, from within and from without, misrepresented its character, or derided and vilified it, or striven to arrest its march, or contrived to create a breach in the ranks of its supporters, succeeded in achieving their malevolent purpose (GPB, p.327)." The Baha'i Faith is unique in the history of the world, as is its Administrative Order, as Shoghi Effendi pointed out in 1944 with this passage:

Photo by hovhaness on flickr
The Administrative Order...is, by virtue of its origin and character, unique in the annals of the world’s religious systems. No Prophet before Bahá’u’lláh, it can be confidently asserted, not even Muhammad Whose Book clearly lays down the laws and ordinances of the Islamic Dispensation, has established, authoritatively and in writing, anything comparable to the Administrative Order which the authorized Interpreter of Bahá’u’lláh’s teachings has instituted, an Order which, by virtue of the administrative principles which its Author has formulated, the institutions He has established, and the right of interpretation with which He has invested its Guardian, must and will, in a manner unparalleled in any previous religion, safeguard from schism the Faith from which it has sprung. Nor is the principle governing its operation similar to that which underlies any system, whether theocratic or otherwise, which the minds of men have devised for the government of human institutions. Neither in theory nor in practice can the Administrative Order of the Faith of Bahá’u’lláh be said to conform to any type of democratic government, to any system of autocracy, to any purely aristocratic order, or to any of the various theocracies, whether Jewish, Christian or Islamic which mankind has witnessed in the past. It incorporates within its structure certain elements which are to be found in each of the three recognized forms of secular government, is devoid of the defects which each of them inherently possesses, and blends the salutary truths which each undoubtedly contains without vitiating in any way the integrity of the Divine verities on which it is essentially founded. The hereditary authority which the Guardian of the Administrative Order is called upon to exercise, and the right of the interpretation of the Holy Writ solely conferred upon him; the powers and prerogatives of the Universal House of Justice, possessing the exclusive right to legislate on matters not explicitly revealed in the Most Holy Book; the ordinance exempting its members from any responsibility to those whom they represent, and from the obligation to conform to their views, convictions or sentiments; the specific provisions requiring the free and democratic election by the mass of the faithful of the Body that constitutes the sole legislative organ in the world-wide Bahá’í community—these are among the features which combine to set apart the Order identified with the Revelation of Bahá’u’lláh from any of the existing systems of human government.

Shoghi Effendi, God Passes By, pp. 336-337

3 comments:

Jess said...

This post was really fascinating to me, George.

Unfortunately, my friend's daughter is sick this week so I haven't been able to attend a meeting with her.

My husband has expressed interest in Baha'i as well. He has never expressed any interest in Christianity but in the short time I have been studying Baha'i he has become intriqued.

Sorry to post this here for the world to see but I have no other way of updating you and I feel like you and your wife are my only Baha'i links at this point and I want to tell someone what we are up too! How silly is that?!

Take care.

Leif Nabil said...

Hello, George. Just a friendly comment about when you say, "advancing the status of their clusters". (I'm writing this here because I couldn't find your email.)

I have noticed a couple people using the word status for the D-->A spectrum, but the 17 Janurary 2003 letter from the Universal House of Justice states:

"To assign a cluster to one or another category is not to make a statement about status. Rather, it is a way of evaluating its capacity for growth, in order that an approach compatible with its evolving development can be adopted."

I have seen communications from the Supreme Body use "state of growth" or "stage of development".

Sorry to be picky. :-)

GWD said...

NOTE: Given Leif's astute observation about my incorrect use of the term "status of clusters" in the original version of this posting, I have taken the liberty to reword the line in question in keeping with his comment and then to re-post it. Thank you, Leif, for your careful reading.